Every answer independently checked. You decide.
Your AI assistants draft, check each other separately, and bring you one result to approve.
Your AIs already connected? Open the live review workspace
Advanced: who drafts, who reviews
Any connected assistant can draft or review. Reviewers work separately and never see each other's review.
You open each assistant when Quorum asks. It cannot run them in the background.
The draft said "under $5,000". The check says $5,600.
Invite your AIs to the table
Connect at least two, so one can check the other. You only do this once.
{{task}}
Ask {{drafterName}} to write the draft
Open {{drafterName}}, start a new chat and send this. Quorum has already given it your task and its role.
Ask each reviewer, separately
The draft is in. Reviews stay sealed until all are in, so no assistant is influenced by another.
Ask {{drafterName}} to revise
All reviews are in and now unsealed. {{drafterName}} will see its draft and every review. Open the same chat, or a new one, and send this.
{{walkTitle}}
ChatGPT will draft. Claude and Grok will each review it separately, without seeing each other's review.
Review complete
{{taskLine}}
The original budget adds up to {{totalBefore}}. The limit was under $5,000.
You can check this yourself: add the left column. The revision trims four lines and now totals {{totalAfter}}.
| Line | Original | Revised | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| {{b.name}} | {{b.before}} | {{b.after}} | {{b.change}} |
| Total | {{totalBefore}} | {{totalAfter}} | {{totalChange}} |
| Under $5,000? | No | Yes |
Trim the cart and supplies, and keep a $500 contingency.
$500 is thin for a first launch. Cut marketing further instead.
You approve every result yourself. Quorum never approves for you.
Evidence and logs
| ID | From | Kind |
|---|---|---|
| {{e.id}} | {{e.from}} | {{e.kind}} |
These entries are simulated. In the real product the log shows what Quorum sent and received. It does not prove what an assistant read or used.